<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UCSJ &#187; NGO Partner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ucsj.org/category/ngo-partner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ucsj.org</link>
	<description>Union of Councils for Jews in the Former Soviet Union &#124; Fighting for human rights and the rule of law. Since 1970.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.ucsj.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Stop the Persecution of Maxim Efimov</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/06/10/stop-the-persecution-of-maxim-efimov/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=stop-the-persecution-of-maxim-efimov</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/06/10/stop-the-persecution-of-maxim-efimov/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efimov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim Efimov]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=1703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maxim Efimov is a chairman of the Karelian regional branch of the inter-regional youth social charity organization “Youth Human Rights Group (YHRG).”  The Karelian branch of YHRG implements human rights protection programs and supports civic initiatives, in particular youth-oriented projects. &#160; On 5 April 2012 the criminal case № 012012120035 against Maxim Efimov was opened [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxim Efimov is a chairman of the Karelian regional branch of the inter-regional youth social charity organization “Youth Human Rights Group (YHRG).”  The Karelian branch of YHRG implements human rights protection programs and supports civic initiatives, in particular youth-oriented projects.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
On 5 April 2012 the criminal case № 012012120035 against Maxim Efimov was opened by the Investigative Committee of the Republic of Karelia for “actions aimed at the incitement of national, racial, or religious enmity, abasement of human dignity, and also propaganda of the exceptionality, superiority, or inferiority of individuals by reason of their attitude to religion, national, or racial affiliation, if these acts have been committed in public or with the use of mass media”, under Part 1 of Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Mr. Efimov was accused of insulting the religious group “ Orthodox Christians” after publishing an article on the website of the Karelian branch of YHRG entitled &#8216;Karelia is tired of priests.&#8217; Maxim Efimov has criticized the priests of the Orthodox Church for cooperating with the Federal Security Service (FSS) as well as those priests who deprive the citizens of their property.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Mr. Efimov has always been a supporter of a secular state. Previously he was the only person in Karelia who openly did not approve the decision of the local authorities to allocate budgetary funds of 15 million rubles for the construction of an Orthodox cathedral in Petrozavodsk. He challenged the mentioned decision before the court afterwards.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
In his article &#8220;Karelia is tired of priests” Maxim Efimov compared the Church to the largest, leading political party “ Yedínaya Rossíya” (United Russia), criticized the unlimited power of intelligence services and oligarchs, the coalescence of the Church and the State, described priests as “bearded men wearing fancy dresses, “ “secretaries for ideology” and “Orthodox spawn.” According to the Investigative Committee of Prosecutor Office, the author of the article deserves to be imprisoned for up to 2 years or fined up to 300 000 rubles. It&#8217;s completely obvious that there are no crime components of Maxim Efimov’s actions and the criminal persecution of him restricts freedom of speech. This is in breach of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. On 10 April 2012 in the nighttime, a search of the private apartment of Maxim Efimov was carried out. During the search, the personal computer and other property of Maxim Efimov were seized. On 12 May 2012 the Petrozavodsk City Court issued a decree to put Maxim Efimov in the mental hospital by force, due to a dubious psychiatric examination as well as the pressure of the Federal Security Service and the Investigative Committee.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
This move may be considered psychiatric abuse of a mentally healthy person. For this reason, Maxim Efimov had to leave Karelia because he has faced the outrage of investigative bodies and courts. The Russian Federation violated the right of Maxim Efimov to a fair trial and fair investigation as well as the right to an effective remedy before a national authority in breach of Article 6 and Article 13 of European Convention on Human Rights. After this departure, Maxim Efimov was declared to be on the federal wanted list. When Mr. Efimov applied for political asylum in the Republic of Estonia, the investigative bodies requested to put Maxim Efimov on the international wanted list and extradite him to the Russian Federation. After the Supreme Court of Karelia canceled the court&#8217;s decision to forcibly put Maxim Efimov in a mental hospital and sent the case to be reissued, the criminal investigator canceled his request and the criminal case was closed. Later the criminal investigator appealed to the court, again demanding to put Maxim Efimov in the mental hospital. We suppose that this dubious criminal persecution is linked with the human rights and journalistic activities of Mr. Efimov and his harsh criticism of Karelian authorities . More than once, Maxim Efimov has criticized the Karelian court for their violation of citizens’ constitutional right to replace a military service with an alternative civil one as well as for unfair judgments. In addition, Mr. Efimov has repeatedly criticized prosecutors , investigators, officers of justice, deputies and senior officials of the Republic of Karelia in a very harsh way. He has also spoken out about the coalescence of authorities and criminals, the embezzlement of public funds and the grave crimes of militiamen.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
We demand to stop the criminal persecution of Maxim Efimov. We also demand that people involved in his persecution be punished according to Article 299 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/06/10/stop-the-persecution-of-maxim-efimov/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Urgent Action: Released Journalist Remains at Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/05/25/urgent-action-released-journalist-remains-at-risk/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=urgent-action-released-journalist-remains-at-risk</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/05/25/urgent-action-released-journalist-remains-at-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkmenistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=1682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rovshen Yazmuhamedov, a Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty journalist, was released from detention on 22 May in Turkmenistan after spending more than two weeks in custody. The charges against him are still unclear. It is likely he had been targeted in connection with his work as a journalist. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) have stated that Rovshen [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Rovshen Yazmuhamedov, a Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty journalist, was released from detention on 22 May in Turkmenistan after spending more than two weeks in custody. The charges against him are still unclear. It is likely he had been targeted in connection with his work as a journalist.</p>
<p>Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) have stated that Rovshen Yazmuhamedov , 30, was released in Turkmenabat, eastern Turkmenistan on 22 May. The charges against him have not been disclosed by the authorities. Rovshen Yazmuhamedov’s family have stated that he was interrogated by security services several times before his detention.</p>
<p>During his detention he was held in a temporary detention facility run by the department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs who are involved in the fight against organized crime and terrorism. His family reported to RFE/RL that the authorities installed surveillance cameras around their home following the detention of Rovshen Yazmuhamedov on 6 May.</p>
<p>Rovshen Yazmuhamedov has been working with the Turkmen service of RFE/RL since September 2012. He is a correspondent and mainly covers social issues.</p>
<p>Please write immediately in Turkmen, Russian, English or your own language:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Calling on the authorities to investigate the legality of Rovshen Yazmuhamedov’s detention and the allegations that he may have been targeted because of his journalist activities;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Urging the authorities to immediately disclose the reasons for his detention and provide details about any charges against him;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Reminding them to ensure that everyone is able to peacefully exercise their right to freedom of expression and association in conformity with Turkmenistan’s obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.</span></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p>PLEASE SEND APPEALS BEFORE 4 JULY 2013 TO:</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p>President of Turkmenistan Gurbanguly BerdymukhamedovPresidential Palace<br />
744000 AshgabatTurkmenistan</p>
<p>Fax: +993 12 93 5112 (please keeptrying between 10-1500 GMT) Salutation: Dear President</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>General Prosecutor<br />
Yaranmirat Yazmiradov<br />
Ul 2005 (Seidi) 4<br />
744000 Ashgabat<br />
Turkmenistan<br />
Salutation: General Prosecutor</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>And copies to :<br />
Minister of Interior<br />
Isgender Mulikov<br />
Ul. 2033 (pr. Mahtumkuli) 85 744000 AshgabatTurkmenistan</p>
<p>Fax: +993 12 39 1944 (please keeptrying between</p>
<p>10 &#8211; 1500 GMT)<img alt="page1image22608" src="https://apps.rackspace.com/mail/svorobye.nsf/mail/svorobye.nsf/iNotes/Proxy/file:///page1image22608" width="72" height="0.400000" /><img alt="page1image22768" src="https://apps.rackspace.com/mail/svorobye.nsf/mail/svorobye.nsf/iNotes/Proxy/file:///page1image22768" width="64" height="0.400000" /></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p>Also send copies to diplomatic representatives accredited to your country.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p>Please check with your section office if sending appeals after the above date. This is the first update of UA 121/13. Further information:<a title="This external link will open in a new window" href="http://amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR61/001/2013/en" target="_blank">http://amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR61/001/2013/en</a></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/05/25/urgent-action-released-journalist-remains-at-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCSJ Letter to the Co-Chairs of the Helsinki Commission</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/04/15/ucsj-letter-to-the-co-chairs-of-the-helsinki-commission/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ucsj-letter-to-the-co-chairs-of-the-helsinki-commission</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/04/15/ucsj-letter-to-the-co-chairs-of-the-helsinki-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow Helsinki Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCSJ Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xenophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=1559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[April 15, 2013 U R G E N T Honorable Senator Benjamin Cardin Honorable Congressman Christopher Smith Co-chairs of the Helsinki Commission of the American Congress (Committee on Foreign Affairs) Dear co-chairs of the Helsinki Commission: Alarming information about the escalation of wide attacks on the Russian NGOs comes every day from Moscow. Almost all [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-1562" alt="ucsj letterhead" src="http://www.ucsj.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ucsj-letterhead-1024x178.jpg" width="1024" height="178" /></p>
<p>April 15, 2013</p>
<p>U R G E N T</p>
<p>Honorable Senator Benjamin Cardin<br />
Honorable Congressman Christopher Smith<br />
Co-chairs of the Helsinki Commission of the American Congress (Committee on Foreign Affairs)</p>
<p>Dear co-chairs of the Helsinki Commission:</p>
<p>Alarming information about the escalation of wide attacks on the Russian NGOs comes every day from Moscow. Almost all powerful inspection departments on the federal and local levels (like Security Service, Prosecutors’ offices, divisions of the Interior Ministry, even Fire Departments, Taxes, Customs, Border Troops, etc.) have been thrown on central Russian and International NGOs (like &#8220;Memorial,&#8221; Moscow Helsinki Group, Human Rights Movement, &#8220;Golos,” Committee Against Tortures, &#8211; about 700 according to President Putin) in spite of recent planned examinations. We know of 222 groups across Russia that have been raided. They include religious organizations as well as pro-democracy and human right groups. The religious groups include Catholics, Evangelical Christians, Jews and Muslims. It is a concerted effort by the Putin government to destroy all such groups by applying the iron hand of the state. Raiders even came to the private apartments of the chairs of important NGOs, like Committee Against Tortures. The explanation was delivered by President Putin, &#8211; how the new law about &#8220;foreign agents&#8221; was to be implemented. In an interview to the German mass-media on April 4, 2013, he said that Russian NGOs received about 1 billion dollars during the last 4 months for &#8220;their political activity inside the country.&#8221; At the same time these NGOs &#8220;violated&#8221; the new law – they did not recognize themselves as &#8220;foreign agents.&#8221;</p>
<p>Everybody knows this government is deathly afraid of free expression and the possibility of true democracy and accountability for violations of human rights. Anti-American rhetoric has become part of the official foreign policy. The economic situation is very poor in Russia but its finances are investing in military equipment. Russian diplomats reject almost all Western initiatives for settling peace and stability. Persecution of the honest NGOs will inhibit the development of public society in Russia and deprive the world of truthful information. The purpose of the raids is to spread fear again all over the society. We are witnesses to the micro-Stalinization of all spheres of freedom, culture, and science. We also see the first attempts to undermine the Helsinki Final Act. The key is to help Russian NGOs to survive and to continue to operate. We need to stop their suffocation by the Putin regime.</p>
<p>The UCSJ has been working in the former Soviet Union since 1970 and up until 1991 was the <b>voice of the Refuseniks</b>. UCSJ consistently advocated for freedom of emigration throughout this time. For the last 20 years, we have been the <b>voice of democratic forces </b>and have fought against anti-Semitism and other forms of xenophobia, working as the <b>bridge between Russian and Western public societies.<br />
</b></p>
<p>We hope that your distinguished Commission can inspire the American public and authorities to help Russian (as well as other parts of the FSU) NGOs to continue their important work. In addition, we hope you will influence the American administration to support NGO protection. As the first organizational measures we propose:</p>
<ul>
<li>to establish a Crisis Support Group (CSG) in Washington D.C. to coordinate efforts to support the integrity of Russian NGOs and their leadership. We are ready to open our offices in Washington DC to aid in this effort;</li>
<li>to run special hearings about the Russian fulfillment of the Helsinki Human Rights Documents</li>
<li>(American Congress, autumn, 2013) with the participation of several Russian NGOs leaders;</li>
<li>to ask the State Department to include in the Magnitsky List the names of officials who persecute</li>
<li>NGOs in the present crisis;</li>
<li>to inform the European Union members about American measures and invite them to join it.</li>
</ul>
<p>Thank you for your understanding.<br />
Sincerely,</p>
<p>Larry Lerner</p>
<p>President</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/04/15/ucsj-letter-to-the-co-chairs-of-the-helsinki-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCSJ Update: Our Discussion with Luidmilla Alexeeva</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/03/11/ucsj-update-our-discussion-with-luidmilla-alexeeva/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ucsj-update-our-discussion-with-luidmilla-alexeeva</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/03/11/ucsj-update-our-discussion-with-luidmilla-alexeeva/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Belarus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCSJ Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCSJ Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xenophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ales Belyatski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luidmilla Alexeeva]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=1466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MARCH 11, 2013 On March 2, 2013, UCSJ President Larry Lerner and International Director Leonid Stonov had an hour long Skype discussion with the Chair of the Moscow Helsinki Group (MHG), Luidmilla Alexeeva. Alexeeva is a long-term partner of UCSJ. She arrived in the US on March 1, 2013, after being invited by Senator Benjamin [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARCH 11, 2013</p>
<p>On March 2, 2013, UCSJ President Larry Lerner and International Director Leonid Stonov had an hour long Skype discussion with the Chair of the Moscow Helsinki Group (MHG), Luidmilla Alexeeva. Alexeeva is a long-term partner of UCSJ. She arrived in the US on March 1, 2013, after being invited by Senator Benjamin Cardin, chairman of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), also known as the U.S. Helsinki Commission. During her stay in the US, Alexeeva will have meetings with many key members of Congress and the human rights community.</p>
<p>During the Skype conference, Alexeeva described the severely deteriorating human rights situation in Russia. She cited the detention and arrests of participants of peaceful meetings and rallies and spoke about the many difficulties that NGOs face today. These range from issues with registration to the regular tortures occurring in police stations and jails. In addition, she described other problems such as the censorship and control of information, increasing extremism and the threat of the new “agents of influence” law that can prevent NGOs from receiving foreign grants.</p>
<p>MHG continues to support UCSJ’s monitoring of antisemitism and xenophobia, as well as our advocacy for the victims of such abuse. MHG permits us to use their network for this monitoring. Alexeeva also stressed that the West needs to improve its collection and dissemination of information regarding mass violence against human rights workers in Russia. UCSJ promised to help with this issue.</p>
<p>UCSJ and Alexeeva also spoke about the Crisis Support Center that we run in our office in Washington D.C. The CSG works to help threatened members of the human rights movements.</p>
<p>Finally, the UCSJ leadership congratulated Alexeeva on her nomination for the Nobel Peace Price (together with Belarusian activist and political prisoner Ales Belyatski) and expressed full support for this nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/03/11/ucsj-update-our-discussion-with-luidmilla-alexeeva/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human Rights Watch Annual Report on Russia: &#8216;worst year for human rights in Russia in recent memory&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/02/04/human-rights-watch-annual-report-on-russia-worst-year-for-human-rights-in-russia-in-recent-memory/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=human-rights-watch-annual-report-on-russia-worst-year-for-human-rights-in-russia-in-recent-memory</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/02/04/human-rights-watch-annual-report-on-russia-worst-year-for-human-rights-in-russia-in-recent-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Moscow Times&#8211; A leading rights group lashed out at President Vladimir Putin on Thursday by saying he had “unleashed the worst political crackdown” in the country’s post-Soviet history after returning to the Kremlin last year. Human Rights Watch’s annual report, released Thursday, says the string of restrictive laws enacted since last summer, as well as the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/last-years-repression-worst-in-decades/474891.html#ixzz2JyBEkjrp" target="_blank">The Moscow Times</a>&#8211;</p>
<p>A leading rights group lashed out at President Vladimir Putin on Thursday by saying he had “unleashed the worst political crackdown” in the country’s post-Soviet history after returning to the Kremlin last year.</p>
<p>Human Rights Watch’s <a href="http://t.co/BjKobAQz" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">annual report</a>, released Thursday, says the string of restrictive laws enacted since last summer, as well as the ongoing harassment of Kremlin critics, amount to “the swift reversal of former President Dmitry Medvedev’s few, timid advances on political freedoms.”</p>
<p>“The past year has been the worst year for human rights in Russia in recent memory,” Rachel Denber, the deputy director of the organization’s Europe and Central Asia division, told reporters in Moscow.</p>
<p>Denber said that even though some of the new laws, like the widening of the definition of treason or harsher sanctions against nongovernmental organizations, had not been implemented yet, they already contribute to an atmosphere of fear: “These laws already play a role,” she said.</p>
<p>Human Rights Watch director Ken Roth said the reason for the crackdown was Putin’s fear of a popular uprising against him.</p>
<p>“I do think the motivation here is the fear of the Russian people,” he told reporters in London.</p>
<p>Roth said the harsh laws were “designed to close the space for dissent” as a response to the mass protests against Putin’s return to the Kremlin.</p>
<p>“The series of uprisings clearly panicked Putin,” he said, according to video footage on Human Rights Watch’s web-footage on Human Rights Watch’s website.</p>
<p>The report, which devotes nine of its 680 pages to Russia, also criticizes the prison sentences for members of the Pussy Riot punk group, the legislation banning “homosexual propaganda” as well as restrictive policies that result in the denial of palliative care for the terminally ill.</p>
<p>It also talks at length about the North Caucasus, where adherents to Salafism, a purist form of Islam, are regularly subjected to persecution and torture, because authorities view them as supporting the Islamist insurgency. The report criticizes Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov for overseeing a system of collective punishment against insurgents’ relatives and suspected supporters.</p>
<p>The authors also note that the European Court of Human Rights has issued more than 210 rulings against Russia, but that the government only pays the required compensation while it fails to implement the core of the judgements by not conducting effective investigations.</p>
<p>“Instead of meaningfully investigating human rights abuses, the government is spending time and energy retaliating against civil society and free speech,” Hugh Williamson, the group’s Europe and Central Asia director, said in an e-mailed statement.</p>
<p>Human Rights Watch also raised the issue of the Olympic Games in Sochi, criticizing that property from hundreds of local families was expropriated for building venues for the games scheduled for February 2014. While most homeowners were compensated, in many cases amounts were unfair and the process was opaque, the report says.</p>
<p>Neither the government nor the Kremlin responded to the criticism Thursday. Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich merely said that he had not read the report but that any negative findings would be wrong.</p>
<p>“We will show that the human rights situation is not so bad in Russia,” he told reporters. He added that such accusations usually come from countries that are not ideal either. “Before you criticize others, you ought to look at yourself,” he was quoted as saying by Interfax.</p>
<p>But Human Right Watch’s Williamson refuted Moscow’s regular line of defense that foreigners should not criticize the country’s human rights record.</p>
<p>“The Kremlin cynically conflates legitimate expressions of concerns about human rights and the rule of law with undermining Russia’s sovereignty. But Russia’s international partners should not be bullied into silence,” he said.</p>
<p>He pointed to the European Union for acting ineffectively in the face of rights abuses in the region. The EU “should adopt a common policy … that would bind their approach on human rights and the rule of law in Russia,” he said in the statement.</p>
<p>Human Rights Watch director Roth pointed to Central Asia as a region where the 27-member bloc’s performance in this respect had been disappointing. “The EU dropped the ball on human rights in Central Asia,” he said in London. As an example, he mentioned the lifting of sanctions against Uzbekistan, which he linked to that country’s role as a transit hub for the NATO troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2013/02/04/human-rights-watch-annual-report-on-russia-worst-year-for-human-rights-in-russia-in-recent-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRF Roundtable Letter on Declining Religious Freedom Conditions in Kazakhstan</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/12/13/irf-roundtable-letter-on-declining-religious-freedom-in-kazakhstan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=irf-roundtable-letter-on-declining-religious-freedom-in-kazakhstan</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/12/13/irf-roundtable-letter-on-declining-religious-freedom-in-kazakhstan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Religious Freedom Round Table (IRF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint NGO Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.N.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xenophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UCSJ, along with other members of the Interfaith Religious Freedom (IRF) Roundtable, sent a letter to the UN regarding our concern for declining religious freedom conditions in Kazakhstan. Click the above link to view it, or read an excerpt below: Prof. Dr. Heiner Bielefeldt Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief Office of the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UCSJ, along with other members of the Interfaith Religious Freedom (IRF) Roundtable, <a href="http://www.ucsj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Letter-to-UN_Kazakhstan.pdf">sent a letter to the UN regarding our concern for declining religious freedom conditions in Kazakhstan.</a></p>
<p>Click the above link to view it, or read an excerpt below:</p>
<p>Prof. Dr. Heiner Bielefeldt<br />
Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief<br />
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)<br />
Palais des Nations<br />
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland</p>
<p>Dear Mr. Rapporteur,<br />
We write as an informal group of organizations and individuals who are scholars, religious leaders, human rights advocates and practitioners to express our deep concern about rising restrictions on religion in the Republic of Kazakhstan. According to the 2012 Annual Report of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, “Conditions for religious freedom declined sharply in Kazakhstan during the reporting period.”</p>
<p>We urge you to visit Kazakhstan at the earliest possible opportunity, perform a review of the situation, identify existing and emerging obstacles to the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief, and present recommendations on ways and means to overcome these obstacles.</p>
<p>Your visit would be consistent with recommendations that were made to Kazakhstan in 2010 as part of the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR). In fact, Kazakhstan accepted the recommendation “To reach out to the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion and Belief to arrange a visit at the earliest possible opportunity (United States of America).”</p>
<p>At the same time, Kazakhstan rejected the recommendation “To abolish requirements for the registration of religious groups from the existing Administrative Code, in accordance with the laws adopted in 2005 on the elimination of extremism and the strengthening national security, and to review the provisions of the Law on Freedom of Religion and Religious Associations in order to effectively guarantee freedom of belief and a non-discriminatory legal system for the registration of religious entities (Mexico).”</p>
<p>Further, Kazakhstan rejected the recommendation “To consider the rules for the registration of religious groups, and to take steps to promote interfaith harmony, including with regard to those faiths considered to be non-traditional in the country, in order to adhere to the Constitution and to international norms (Norway).”</p>
<p>Finally, the subsequent rising restrictions on religion are the result of two new laws that were enacted without debate and signed by President Nazarbaev in October 2011 – a new Religion Law and an Administrative Code Law that amends nine other laws and legal provisions related to religious activity and religious associations.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucsj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Letter-to-UN_Kazakhstan.pdf">MORE</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/12/13/irf-roundtable-letter-on-declining-religious-freedom-in-kazakhstan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Oral History of the Rally to Save Soviet Jewry</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/12/07/an-oral-history-of-the-rally-to-save-soviet-jewry/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=an-oral-history-of-the-rally-to-save-soviet-jewry</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/12/07/an-oral-history-of-the-rally-to-save-soviet-jewry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refusenik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCSJ Member]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom Sunday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=1162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tablet Magazine How We Freed Soviet Jewry Twenty-five years ago today, a rally of 250,000 people changed the fate of Jews worldwide. An oral history. By Allison Hoffman Originally published December 6, 2012. (American Jewish Historical Society) &#160; Twenty-five years ago today, an estimated quarter of a million Americans, most of them Jews, flooded the Mall [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/118468/how-we-freed-soviet-jewry" target="_blank"><strong>Tablet Magazine</strong></a></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-size: x-large;">How We Freed Soviet Jewry</span></strong></div>
<div>
<p>Twenty-five years ago today, a rally of 250,000 people changed the fate of Jews worldwide. An oral history.</p>
<div>By <a href="http://www.tabletmag.com/author/ahoffman/" target="_blank">Allison Hoffman</a></div>
<div>Originally published December 6, 2012.</div>
<div>
<div><img src="http://cdn1.tabletmag.com/wp-content/files_mf/march_120512.jpg" alt="" /><em>(American Jewish Historical Society)</em></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Twenty-five years ago today, an estimated quarter of a million Americans, most of them Jews, flooded the Mall in Washington, D.C., to demand freedom for the <em>refuseniks</em>—Jews living inside the Soviet Union who were denied permission to leave the country. The Dec. 6, 1987, rally was planned for the day before a historic summit meeting at the White House between President Ronald Reagan and leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev. The demonstration was the brainchild of Natan Sharansky, the most famous of all the <em>refuseniks</em>, who spent nine years in a Moscow prison on charges of being an American spy until his release and emigration to Israel in February 1986. It capped more than 15 years of organized efforts to assist Jews living under Communist rule—and became the largest protest on behalf of a Jewish cause ever in the United States.</p>
<p>Perhaps most impressively, it mobilized the American Jewish community—young and old, secular and religious, liberal and conservative—behind a single cause to a degree that had never been seen before, and has not been seen since.</p>
<p>This is a history of the march as told by people who were there and who helped make it happen. They include Jack Lew, President Obama’s chief of staff; Fred Zeidman, one of Mitt Romney’s key Jewish advisers; and Sharansky, who went on to found the Israeli political party Yisrael B’Aliyah, which eventually merged with Likud. All agree the Dec. 6 rally was a landmark event in modern Jewish history.</p>
<p>Natan Sharansky <em>(former refusenik, now Jewish Agency chairman)</em>: It was Elie Wiesel who at some meeting with students, maybe even before my release, said that it would be good to have a march on Washington. And we didn’t know yet when, but at some moment we knew Gorbachev had to come to Washington. So, when I came in May of 1986 for the first time to America, Ed Koch had a reception for Jewish leaders at Gracie Mansion, and I said, “When Gorbachev comes, let’s have 400,000 American Jews come to Washington, in order to remind him that there are 400,000 Soviet Jews.” Everybody smiled and was happy, but it wasn’t taken too seriously.</p>
<p><strong>Rabbi Haskel Lookstein <em>(leader of Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun in Manhattan and principal of the Ramaz School)</em></strong>: Natan told me about his plan months and months in advance. I was initially skeptical he could pull it off—getting 250,000 people to come to Washington is really a huge, huge effort. But he was really determined to do it.</p>
<p><strong>Sharansky: </strong>In the summer of 1987 it was already clear to me that in a few months, Gorbachev will come and nothing had happened. Morris Abram, who was the head of the Conference of Presidents [of Major American Jewish Organizations], said to me, “Natan, we cannot guarantee hundreds of thousands of Jews, so let’s do what is possible. We will bring 100 senators to the steps of the Capitol and they will declare to Gorbachev, ‘Let our people go,’ and that will be very powerful.” I said, 100 senators is great, but Gorbachev knows very well that’s just politics. I wanted expression, mass expression. Then my friend Avi Weiss, who was the head of the Student Struggle for Soviet Jewry, he says, “Natan, you cannot trust the establishment, so I tell you what we will do, we will bring 100 rabbis and we will chain ourselves to the gates and we will be arrested, and that will be something real.” So, it was between 100 senators and 100 rabbis.</p>
<p><strong>Gordon Zacks <em>(former adviser to George H.W. Bush)</em>: </strong>Natan and I were in constant contact. He came to me to get counsel on how to proceed. I finally told him it was never going to happen through the establishment organizations, and that it if was going to happen at the magnitude he wanted it to, he was going to have to be the guy who went around to college campuses to create the energy and excitement he needed. And that’s what he did.</p>
<p><strong>Sharansky:</strong> People said, “You are sitting in Jerusalem, and you come here from time to time and say let’s have a march, but that’s not serious.” They said move for a few months to America. So, at the end of August 1987 I came with my wife and our 10-month-old daughter. Some friends gave us an apartment in New York. And then Jack Lew, who was not part of the movement but was a very close friend, helped in Washington. He was a lawyer then, and his office became the coordinating office.</p>
<p><strong>Jack Lew <em>(former policy adviser for House Speaker Tip O’Neill, now White House chief of staff)</em>: </strong>My wife and I had become part of the circle that helped Avital if she needed a place to stay, if she needed someone to drive her somewhere, if she needed help making a decision. She really became part of our community. The law firm where I was, Van Ness Feldman, was not a random place. A lot of people there had worked for Scoop Jackson, and had been involved in the history of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson%E2%80%93Vanik_amendment" target="_blank">Jackson-Vanik amendment</a>. So, they knew the issue and they really considered it an honor to work with Natan.</p>
<p><strong>Sharansky: </strong>I was in 30 different communities, almost to the day of the demonstration. In every community there were people who knew me, or knew Avital, and there were activists everywhere. And in every community where I spoke, they were very enthusiastic about a demonstration. So, I couldn’t understand from where all these doubts came from in these meetings in New York and Washington. It was such a contrast between people who felt they could not take such responsibility and everyone who wanted it at the local level.</p>
<p><strong>Lew: </strong>Natan did all the trips, and David Makovsky and I alternated traveling with him, whether it was Minneapolis, Chicago, or Kansas City. Wherever he went, he’d draw a huge audience. He asked people to charter buses and airplanes, and they started doing it. And it became clear that a lot of people were going to come.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><strong><img src="http://cdn1.tabletmag.com/wp-content/files_mf/gorbachev_120512.jpg" alt="" /></strong></div>
<div><em>(American Jewish Historical Society)</em></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Pamela Cohen <em>(former president of the Union of Councils for Soviet Jews)</em>: </strong>We started pulling up troops. We had 35 councils in our grassroots movement. We’d made it a policy that since we could not do advocacy every day from the central office, we would split things up into caseloads. We’d give our activists a family and say you have to get your congressman and your synagogue to adopt them. So, all these people, as soon as they heard about the march, of course they had to go to represent their person.</p>
<div>A Jewish organized rally in Washington up to that point had been no more than 12,000 or 13,000 people in Lafayette Park.</div>
<p><strong>David Harris <em>(former head of the Washington office of the American Jewish Committee, now executive director)</em>: </strong>The question was, would enough people come to warrant a public rally or demonstration. That was the real question. The reason it was asked was because, first, it was pointing toward winter. Second, we knew we wouldn’t have lots and lots of lead time. And third, the record for a Jewish organized rally in Washington up to that point had been no more than 12,000 or 13,000 people in Lafayette Park. We were supposed to put on this rally that’s meant to impress Gorbachev and the Soviet leadership. Why would 12,000 people in the vast Mall impress anyone?</p>
<p><strong>Susan Green <em>(former executive director at Greater New York Conference on Soviet Jewry)</em>:</strong> We had been doing rallies in New York, so it was kind of a no-brainer that if the head of the Soviet Union was going to be in the United States, then we’d do something. The idea was to organize the country, to get the funding in place, try and set as much of the groundwork as you could before you had any of the details so that once you did have the details, you weren’t starting from scratch. People had to be prepared, and we didn’t know if we’d have a week’s notice or a month’s notice. So, there was this task force for Freedom Sunday. And not from day one, but somewhere down the line, David Harris ended up heading up this task force.</p>
<p><strong>Harris: </strong>It was planning for a rally without the ability to pinpoint a date, which is not a small detail. The reference point for everyone is the date. Give us the date! And we couldn’t, because everything was contingent on the Reagan-Gorbachev schedules. When we did finally learn the date, which was from the White House, as I recall we had 36 or 37 days, so just over five weeks.</p>
<p><strong>Green: </strong>Once we got the date, everyone dropped everything, and this is what people worked on. There was the building owned by the <a href="http://rac.org/" target="_blank">Religious Action Center</a>, and all these Jewish organizations were renting office space there. And because the New York Conference was the organization that had the experience with organizing the big rallies and the events, we ended up getting plugged in a lot more than other New York organizations. We had it down to a science.</p>
<p><strong>Rabbi David Saperstein <em>(executive director of the Religious Action Center)</em>: </strong>We turned the conference room over to this and brought in early computers and phone banks. The logistics were just huge. You had people coming in from all over the country, and of course it was before email, but we had to use computers to give an accurate run on buses coming in and the rest of it.</p>
<p><strong>Harris: </strong>That was my first real experience being a coordinator of something which just kept growing and growing.</p>
<p><strong>Green:</strong> I had started going down to Washington a month or so before, a couple of days a week. Then the last two weeks I just moved into the Omni Hotel on Dupont Circle, and everyone in New York was working on this as well. There were 900 or 1,000 buses that came down just from the New York area. One of the big things was, “Are there even enough buses on the East Coast to rent?” So we just started calling all the bus companies and putting a light reserve on them, so they didn’t get rented out by, you know, Canadian tourists going to Woodbury Common. There were trains that were chartered, picking up people in Manhattan, in Philadelphia, along the way. And there were people flying, people driving, every way you could imagine.</p>
<p><strong>Rabbi Shaul Osadchey <em>(former rabbi of Houston Congregation Brith Shalom and former director of Houston B’nai B’rith Hillel Foundation)</em>: </strong>We chartered a plane. It came out to $200 a seat, and there were 119 seats on the plane, so I said, I can guarantee two-thirds of the seats, so if the rest of the Jewish community can guarantee one-third, we can do it. Of course everyone said yes! So, I invited every high-school kid in my congregation to join me, and I offered to pay their ticket if they couldn’t afford it.</p>
<p><strong>Scott Lasensky <em>(former regional president, B’nai B’rith Youth Organization, Orange County, Calif.)</em>:</strong> Soviet Jewry was just the biggest issue, probably bigger than Israel. People were wearing the bracelets, people were dedicating their bar and bat mitzvahs to the issue. Someone in the community gave money to fly teenagers from Orange County. I was 16. It was all quite last minute—I don’t remember where we stayed, so it might have been just overnight, out on a red-eye and back that night.</p>
<p><strong>Lookstein: </strong>We’d organized a lot of couples to go to the Soviet Union in the 1970s and ’80s to help <em>refuseniks</em>, starting with ourselves. My wife and I went in September of 1972 and in 1975, which is when we met Natan. So, it was not such a big deal to organize people to go from New York to Washington. We had 20 busloads of students from Ramaz and members of the KJ community, 50 people each, so that was 1,000 people.</p>
<p><strong>Margy-Ruth Davis <em>(former executive director of the Greater New York Conference on Soviet Jewry)</em>:</strong> We’d been doing these demonstrations in New York for years. We had 20,000 people in Madison Square Garden in 1971 for Freedom Lights, which showed that it could be done, and that led to the Solidarity Sunday marches, which started in 1972. So, we had kids who had grown up going to Solidarity Sunday marches, and this was nothing different to them. No one ahead of time felt it was going to be something fundamentally different. I just felt, well, this year we’re going to Washington.</p>
<p><strong>Fred Zeidman <em>(Republican Jewish activist from Houston)</em>: </strong>I had a good friend in New York and we’d been talking about it, and finally we just said, “We gotta go.” I thought it was something we needed to do. And the kids had never been to Washington, so we took them two days early and traipsed them through the museums and things.</p>
<p><strong>Osadchey: </strong>We left at 6 in the morning the day of the march. We flew into National because we needed to get to the Mall as quickly as we could. I remember we were on this plane, and all the flight attendants were serving alcohol. Halfway down the aisle they ran out of Diet Coke, and someone said, “This is a Jewish group!”</p>
<p align="right"><strong></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><strong><img src="http://cdn1.tabletmag.com/wp-content/files_mf/chicago-delegation_120512.jpg" alt="" /></strong></div>
<div><em>(American Jewish Historical Society)</em></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Lookstein:</strong> I went down on the buses with my people. Coming into RFK [Stadium, the staging area for bus parking] was tedious, but it was also very exciting. I remember standing in the middle of that throng of a quarter of a million people. It was thrilling! Everybody was excited and I would say happy. That was the mood. It was almost like a celebration.</p>
<p><strong>Cohen: </strong>It was definitely celebratory. And I was very ambivalent about the fact that it was a celebration. I had a feeling we should be draping the podium in black, that it should be much more somber. I just felt the celebration was premature. But then I remember seeing the crowd and the placards and the faces of the people who were there. It looked like an endless sea of Jews. And it did what it was supposed to do. It put Reagan in the position of being able to say to Gorbachev, you think this is my issue, because Shultz has made it an issue. But this put it right in the Soviets’ face. The demonstration was an explosive event that was a culmination of all the hard slogging and inglorious work we’d been doing all those years.</p>
<p><strong>Green: </strong>There was more at stake on an issue level because of Gorbachev. Because we really needed Reagan to be able to look out the window and say, “Look at those people.”</p>
<div>We met with Reagan just before the Jewish New Year. But I had a hidden agenda, and my hidden agenda was to get a blessing from him, for the demonstration.</div>
<p><strong>Sharansky: </strong>There was an argument that we should not be spoiling the peace. I had come with Avital to America, and I decided to use it as a pretext to see Reagan, because he had met many times with my wife while I was in prison, and he met with me after my release, but we never met together. So, that was the pretext, that we wanted to thank him. We <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1987/09/24/world/reagan-and-sharansky-meet.html" target="_blank">met</a> with him just before the Jewish New Year. But I had a hidden agenda, and my hidden agenda was to get a blessing from him, for the demonstration. So, I said to President Reagan, “You know soon the general secretary of the Communist Party, Mr. Gorbachev, will come, and I want you to know that we, Jewish activists, are going to have a big demonstration, and I want you to understand that it’s not directed in any way against your policies. I was trying to be very careful because I didn’t want to ask him for permission but I want him to say something. And he stops me in the middle of it and says, “Somebody can think that I want friendship with him when he is keeping his people in prison? You do everything you have to do. And I’ll do everything. You don’t have to ask me. Do what you have to do!”</p>
<p><strong>Norman Goldstein <em>(organizer of <a href="http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/12/11/2742124/dc-jews-commemorate-21-year-soviet-jewry-vigil" target="_blank">daily vigils</a> for Soviet Jews at the Soviet Embassy in Washington, 1970-1991)</em>: </strong>The day of the rally was a phenomenally beautiful day. They had a reception at the B’nai B’rith building, and then we walked to Farragut Square toward the march. And at the exit of the Metro all of a sudden you saw droves of people, and they were all carrying flags—American flags, Israeli flags, signs saying, “Let my People Go.” We had trouble getting a minyan for the vigil, so you can’t imagine the feeling of it, when we’d worked on this cause for so many years. Everyone showed up, young and old, religious and secular, left-wing and right-wing. You can’t imagine the feeling of it.</p>
<p><strong>Lasensky:</strong> I remember the buzz of the rally. It was freezing. I was wearing my letterman jacket. We were California kids, so we didn’t have anything else! We staged at the White House; I remember seeing the anti-nuclear protesters. Washington was quite foreign to me, and we were told where to go. There was a banner, an Orange County banner, and the BBYO people gathered with the rest of the Orange County delegation, but we broke off pretty quickly, and my friend and I climbed up a light pole. I was a stunt-prone young person. But it was hard to see anything, and the light pole was a good way to get a perspective on it.</p>
<p><strong>Harris: </strong>The Ellipse [in front of the White House] was the staging ground. We had state signs, and people were supposed to congregate that way. And then from the Ellipse we marched down to the Mall.</p>
<p><strong>Goldstein: </strong>My son was 3 or 4 years old, and I marched with him on my shoulders, and a sign that said, “Goldstein.” And there was a guy I went to visit in Kiev, very shortly before the march, maybe in 1986, and I never imagined I’d see him again. But then there he was. We ran into him literally by chance.</p>
<p><strong>Osadchey:</strong> I’d been a student at Berkeley, so I’d been involved in every imaginable demonstration, but when we got to the Mall, none of these kids knew what to do. We had this big banner, “Houston Stands Tall for Soviet Jewry,” so I got everyone behind the banner. I was wearing a brown coat with all my Soviet Jewry buttons on it, and we all had ten-gallon Stetsons. We were quite a sight to behold.</p>
<p><strong>Sharansky: </strong>We walked in the parade, it was Elie Wiesel, Morris Abram, and myself, and we still didn’t know what would be there on the Mall. I was very nervous. Elie was very relaxed, very positive, but we both felt very responsible for this. And then we heard the report of the police, and they said 50,000. Then we heard the report that said 100,000. And I thought, all right, now there can be rain.</p>
<p><strong>Harris: </strong>The world, the Kremlin, was watching, and we responded. The media was watching, and I realized that all they were going to report was the number of people who were there. So, when the police counted 250,000, I realized it didn’t matter whether people ran over their time to speak, or whether people had to wait in line for the Port-A-Sans, or for shuttles at RFK. We weren’t throwing a bar mitzvah. We were throwing a political moment.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><strong><img src="http://cdn1.tabletmag.com/wp-content/files_mf/soviet_jewry_120512_620px.jpg" alt="" /></strong></div>
<div><em>(American Jewish Historical Society)</em></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Green: </strong>We wanted to let the Soviet government know that this was our issue, and we were fighting and we weren’t going to stop. We wanted to let the American government know that this was important not just to the Jewish community, but to the American community—that this was a human rights issue that we cared about. And the message was also to Soviet Jews themselves, who always heard about the rallies, always, either on Voice of America, or they saw pictures of it, and they could know that they weren’t alone and that people were working for them.</p>
<p><strong>Sam Kliger <em>(former refusenik)</em>:</strong> It was broadcast on Voice of America and Radio Liberty, but only a very few people could listen to it. I did not know it would be broadcast, because of course <em>Gazeta Pravda</em> didn’t report that this march was happening, and there was no Internet at that time, no cell phones, in many cases even no regular telephones. But one person told another that there was this huge march in Washington, and it was a big, big boost.</p>
<p><strong>Cohen:</strong> In the end it was definitely celebratory. Peter, Paul and Mary were there, Pearl Bailey was there. For me, I was swept up by the fact that Natan was there, and Vladimir Slepak was there. We’d never met, until that day.</p>
<p><strong>Zacks: </strong>I was on the dais, and I introduced the vice president. He came to this rally, and he knew the political tension that would exist between his role as vice president and his role as a citizen. The following day he was going to be part of the group meeting with Gorbachev and President Reagan, but the vice president elected to come because he wanted to be there.</p>
<p><strong>Goldstein: </strong>The only thing that’s not memorable was the speeches. It was all the usual stuff, except when Sharansky spoke. I was on the dais for some of it, but then I got down and stood with my family. There was no place for the wealthy and the rest of it—that was one of the beauties of the thing.</p>
<p><strong>Sharansky:</strong> When I was speaking, I was improvising, because I never wrote speeches. That day was easy for me. I said, Look, how many times did we hear there will be rain, there will be no demonstration, and now there is sun, and you are all here.</p>
<p><strong>Saperstein: </strong>People would say, Who did the opening narration? I used <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/19/obituaries/g-hirschberg-69-a-manhattan-rabbi-and-a-civic-leader.html" target="_blank">Gunter Hirschberg</a>, who had been cantor at Temple Rodeph Sholom. He had a magnificent voice, an extraordinary basso profundo voice, and having been born in Germany but raised in Britain, he spoke in a British accent. So, you had this guy who looked like Cesar Romero and to many people sounded like the voice of God.</p>
<div>From the podium, it looked like an endless sea of Jews. It was as if the horizon ended with the crowd.</div>
<p><strong>Cohen:</strong> From the podium, it looked like an endless sea of Jews. It was as if the horizon ended with the crowd. There was nothing else. It was a huge, huge, huge crowd. And it was cold! It was a very cold day, and people were all bundled up and wearing earmuffs and jumping in place and huddled together, and you could see their breath. But there was this tremendous, tremendous electrical excitement that warmed everybody. And I don’t think anyone wanted to leave.</p>
<p><strong>Leonard Fein <em>(author and former editor of</em> Moment<em>)</em>: </strong>There was a certain point where I was up near the mike, and I announced this was a reunion for the Jewish people. “Let it begin here and now—there is a tent here by the stage for lost children, so please go reclaim them now.”</p>
<p><strong>Zeidman: </strong>We were staying at a little place, a Holiday Inn or something on the other side of Independence, so we walked across the Mall to where the march was, and our 7-year-old kid wanted a popsicle, and then the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1987/12/07/world/march-by-200000-in-capital-presses-soviet-on-rights.html?pagewanted=2&amp;src=pm" target="_blank">got him</a>. We made the whole march, and then we got on the buses with everyone else from Houston for the plane ride home.</p>
<p><strong>Osadchey: </strong>We timed it so we got back in time for a community rally that evening in Houston. Pete Yarrow had been at the march, and they played his song “Light One Candle” as we all came into the sanctuary.</p>
<p><strong>Sharansky: </strong>Afterward, there were some receptions, the American Jewish Committee gave some prizes, the UJA had some things for donors. I didn’t really understand these things yet. And then I went back home. I felt my mission—frankly, I thought, that’s it. Now it’s enough to be a Soviet Jew, and I can start a normal life.</p>
<p><strong>Goldstein: </strong>Reagan said to Gorbachev, “Yesterday I had 250,000 people in my backyard saying, ‘Let my people go.’ Until you do what they want, nothing will happen.” And after that, things changed. So, to me it ensured Israel’s survival and it brought down the Soviet Union. It was the high point for my generation’s lives as Jews.</p>
<p><strong>Davis:</strong> I didn’t think at the time that it was such a big deal. It seemed to me that the movement had won. History is such a funny thing—all you can say is that these things all happened at the same time, and the Jews got out of the Soviet Union. I do know that what it did for us was probably more than it did for them in terms of creating a sense of unity, of pride, and a feeling that Jews around the world were responsible for doing something and that they could do something for each other.</p>
<p><strong>Sharansky: </strong>It was the final act in this long, long struggle of American Jewry. A whole generation of American Jews lived and fought this issue. It was their struggle.</p>
<p><strong>***</strong></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/12/07/an-oral-history-of-the-rally-to-save-soviet-jewry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human Rights Groups in Russia Firmly Against New ‘Foreign Agent’ Law</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/11/26/human-rights-groups-in-russia-firmly-against-new-foreign-agent-law/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=human-rights-groups-in-russia-firmly-against-new-foreign-agent-law</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/11/26/human-rights-groups-in-russia-firmly-against-new-foreign-agent-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow Helsinki Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=1075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human rights groups in Russia are standing firmly against the new ‘Foreign Agent’ law as it goes into effect. This law requires nonprofit groups that receive any funding from outside Russia to label themselves as “foreign agents.” In addition, it expands the legal definition of treason to include “providing financial, technical, advisory or other assistance [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human rights groups in Russia are standing firmly against the new ‘Foreign Agent’ law as it goes into effect. This law requires nonprofit groups that receive any funding from outside Russia to label themselves as “foreign agents.” In addition, it expands the legal definition of treason to include “providing financial, technical, advisory or other assistance to a foreign state or international organization.”</p>
<p>This new law was passed in the wake of the large anti-Kremlin protests that occurred after President Putin’s inauguration. Putin blamed these protests on the interference of foreign governments.</p>
<p>Human rights groups like Memorial and For Human Rights are already dealing with acts of intimidation and vandalism due to this law. Both had “Foreign Agent” spray-painted on their buildings last Wednesday.</p>
<p>Many human rights groups have decided to defy the ‘Foreign Agent’ law, despite the many repercussions that they could face, including fines, a forced shutdown and/or a prison sentence of up to two years. Memorial’s chairman, Oleg P. Orlov, explains, “A foreign agent equals a traitor, a betrayer of the homeland. [Groups that comply] will be outcasts of society. They will be branded. The public will look at them with suspicion, and officials will simply refuse to associate with them. They will be outcasts.” Other groups have opted to simply stop receiving any form of outside funding.</p>
<p>It is not yet apparent how the ‘Foreign Agent’ law will be enforced, as the wording is vague and is supposed to only include groups involved in “political activities.” The Justice Ministry will be overseeing it.</p>
<p>Based on reporting by <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/europe/rights-groups-in-russia-reject-foreign-agent-label.html?_r=0" target="_blank">The New York Times</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/11/26/human-rights-groups-in-russia-firmly-against-new-foreign-agent-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elie Wiesel and Natan Sharansky Discuss 1987 March on Washington for Soviet Jewry</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/11/23/elie-wiesel-and-natan-sharansky-discuss-1987-march-on-washington-for-soviet-jewry/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elie-wiesel-and-natan-sharansky-discuss-1987-march-on-washington-for-soviet-jewry</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/11/23/elie-wiesel-and-natan-sharansky-discuss-1987-march-on-washington-for-soviet-jewry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Semitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow Helsinki Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refusenik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCSJ Member]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December 1987 march]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elie Wiesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom 25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March on Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natan Sharansky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=1043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the this year&#8217;s General Assembly (GA) of the Jewish Federations of North America, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Elie Wiesel and Natan Sharansky, former Soviet Refusenik, discussed the historical significance of the Sunday, December 6, 1987 march on Washington for Soviet Jewry. This 1987 march was the largest American Jewish demonstration in history, with over [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the this year&#8217;s General Assembly (GA) of the Jewish Federations of North America, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Elie Wiesel and Natan Sharansky, former Soviet Refusenik, discussed the historical significance of the Sunday, December 6, 1987 march on Washington for Soviet Jewry. This 1987 march was the largest American Jewish demonstration in history, with over 250,000 people taking part.</p>
<p>Sharansky and Wiesel both noted that &#8220;students and housewives&#8221; were the driving force behind the December 1987 demonstration, not the established Jewish organizations. Indeed, American Jewish leaders were initially skeptical that the December 1987 rally (scheduled to coincide with a meeting in D.C. between President Reagan and Soviet Premier Gorbachev) would attract more than 17,000 people.Thanks to the grassroots Jewish community that included organizations like UCSJ, there was a much larger turnout of over 250,000 people.</p>
<p>This demonstration encouraged the American Jewish establishment to take action.</p>
<p>Sharansky described feeling &#8220;vindicated&#8221; and &#8220;inspired&#8221; by the large crowd that came out in support. Wiesel added that there was a shared feeling “that you are not alone, that there was a sense of history about you, always remembering Jewish history,” adding “with it you can never fail.”</p>
<p>Based on reporting by <a href="http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/international-news/ga-old-guard-frets-over-new" target="_blank">The Jewish Week</a>.</p>
<div class="woo-sc-hr"></div>
<p><em>The <a href="http://freedom25.net/about" target="_blank">Freedom 25</a> coalition is currently planning a series of events to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the December 1987 march. Their goal is &#8220;to assure that the critical lessons of the Soviet Jewry movement are learned by future generations, so they can again be applied to expand the reach of freedom.&#8221; </em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://freedom25.net/" target="_blank">Visit their website</a> for more information on these events, including a <a href="http://freedom25.net/march" target="_blank">virtual march on December 6, 2012</a> that you can sign up for online.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/11/23/elie-wiesel-and-natan-sharansky-discuss-1987-march-on-washington-for-soviet-jewry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russian Activist Razvozzhayev&#8217;s Plea Denied</title>
		<link>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/11/13/russian-activist-razvozzhayevs-plea-denied/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=russian-activist-razvozzhayevs-plea-denied</link>
		<comments>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/11/13/russian-activist-razvozzhayevs-plea-denied/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCSJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights (HR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anatomy of the Protest 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left Front]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonid Razvozzhayev]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucsj.org/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russian activist Leonid Razvozzhayev&#8217;s plea to cancel a lower court&#8217;s decision to keep him in pre-trial custody was rejected last week, according to Voice of America. He is currently being held in Moscow. Razvozzhayev is a member of the radical leftist party Left Front that has taken part in anti-governmental protests since last year. He is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian activist Leonid Razvozzhayev&#8217;s plea to cancel a lower court&#8217;s decision to keep him in pre-trial custody was rejected last week, <a href="http://blogs.voanews.com/breaking-news/2012/11/07/russia-keeps-activist-in-custody/" target="_blank">according to Voice of America</a>. He is currently being held in Moscow.</p>
<p>Razvozzhayev is a member of the radical leftist party Left Front that has taken part in anti-governmental protests since last year. He is also one of the three men portrayed in the &#8220;documentary&#8221; that aired on the pro-Kremlin NTV in October. Entitled &#8220;Anatomy of the Protest-2 &#8220;accuses him and other colleagues of <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-russia-arrest-20121025,0,1481023.story" target="_blank">&#8220;meeting with politicians from neighboring Georgia to discuss funding subversive activities in Russia.&#8221;</a></p>
<p><em>In an official statement entitled<a href="http://www.ucsj.org/2012/10/23/the-regime-has-crossed-the-red-line/" target="_blank"> &#8220;The Regime Has Crossed the Red Line&#8221;</a> our partner NGO <a href="http://www.zaprava.ru/english/" target="_blank">For Human Rights</a> stated &#8221; even if all the words said by the participants of the meeting shown in the film “Anatomy of the Protest-2” are true, <strong>there is absolutely no legal grounds for the prosecution of the accused people.</strong></em></p>
<p>According to Razvozzhayev, he arrived in the Moscow prison by being kidnapped, tortured and forced to confess.</p>
<p>He states that on  October 24, 2012, after leaving the UNHCR office in Kiev where he was seeking asylum, he was kidnapped, forced into a van and handcuffed by his wrists and ankles, which were linked together. His eyes were also covered. After five hours, he was handed over to a different set of men who imprisoned him in a basement for multiple days without any food, water or access to a bathroom.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/25/world/europe/leonid-razvozzhayev-says-abductors-threatened-his-children.html" target="_blank">In a</a><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/25/world/europe/leonid-razvozzhayev-says-abductors-threatened-his-children.html" target="_blank">n interview, Razvozzhayev said</a>, &#8220;“They told me, ‘If you don’t answer our questions, your children will be killed.’ They said that legally I didn&#8217;t exist, and anything could happen to me.”</p>
<p>He was brought to Moscow after signing the confession.</p>
<p>According to Russia&#8217;s Investigative Committee, Razvozzhayev turned himself in voluntarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ucsj.org/2012/11/13/russian-activist-razvozzhayevs-plea-denied/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
